For nurse practitioners · Idaho
Licensure as an APRN authorizes advanced practice including prescribing, administering and dispensing therapeutic pharmacologic agents; the statute requires only that APRNs 'collaborate with other health professionals' — no supervision or physician agreement.
Idaho removed physician supervision from its NP rules quietly — the secondary histories put it around 2004 — and never wrote it back. The current statute’s only inter-professional duty is that an APRN collaborates with other health professionals in providing care: a description of good practice, not a supervision mandate.
The requirement
none — independence at licensure
The moment it attaches
automatic at APRN licensure
The timeline
Physician supervision/direction requirement removed circa 2004
Idaho quietly deleted physician oversight from its NP rules around 2004 and never wrote it back: the current statute's only inter-professional duty is that an APRN 'collaborates with other health professionals in providing health care' — a description, not a supervision mandate.
Idaho Code § 54-1402 (definitions, APRN); board rules at IDAPA 24.34.01 (formerly 23.01.01)
Full scope as defined by the Board of Nursing: advanced nursing practice including prescribing, administering and dispensing therapeutic pharmacologic agents; APRNs may perform only acts for which they are educationally prepared, as provided by the board.
Statutes move, boards write rules, sunsets arrive. This watch is checked against primary sources on a standing cadence — last verified 11 August 2026 — and every item links the source it was read from.
Rulemaking in progress
Idaho's Board of Nursing is rewriting IDAPA 24.34.01, reworking renewal deadlines and temporary APRN licensure.
Idaho DOPL, Board of Nursing statutes, rules and rulemaking (IDAPA 24.34.01)
The inventory, split honestly. Nothing dark is dressed as live.
In the product today
Opening with the founding cohort
Built, on sample data for now
No physician attached means no standing invoice between you and your own practice — the economics of independence here are unusually legible. What Gale adds is built to read the same way.
The deepest state cluster we have built is California’s — eight guides on the 103/104 ladder, cited to the statute and the board’s own filings. They are California’s rules, not Idaho’s; the same treatment is coming state by state. Until then, they show the depth of homework to expect from us.
The California playbook →Gale publishes a public directory compiled from the NPPES registry. Find your listing, claim it, and see how you rank for your own name — that page is the front door your independent practice will be found through.