Fertility

Finding a Clinic That's Strong on Male Factor

Save

Many fertility clinics are built around the female patient and treat the male workup as a box to tick. When sperm is the issue, that gap costs time and cycles. This is how to tell whether a clinic is genuinely strong on male factor — its andrology lab, its access to a reproductive urologist, and whether it reaches for the right tool rather than the most expensive one.

Last updated: July 2026

Talk to a clinician

Gale can help you find a clinician in your state and request a visit.

Find care →

How do you find a clinic that's strong on male factor?

A clinic is strong on male factor when four things are true: it evaluates the male partner concurrently rather than as an afterthought, it has a capable andrology lab, it can access a reproductive urologist for surgical and medical treatment, and it uses procedures like ICSI for a real reason rather than as a default upsell. Judging male-factor clinic strength means asking about each of those directly, because a program can produce good overall numbers while handling the male side thinly.

A male-factor-strong clinic evaluates both partners at once and can escalate to a reproductive urologist without sending you to start over elsewhere.

Male factor contributes to a large share of infertility, and the tools to treat it are specific. The rest of this covers what to look for and what to ask, one piece at a time.

Both partners, worked up at the same time

The first sign of a serious male-factor program is that it evaluates both partners from the start. The joint urology and reproductive-medicine guideline is explicit that the male partner should be evaluated concurrently, with semen analyses, and that male infertility can be the first sign of a serious underlying condition such as testicular cancer, a pituitary tumor, or a hormone disorder 1. The standard female fertility evaluation is built to run alongside a male workup, not instead of one 2.

So a clinic that starts the female partner on treatment before the male partner has had a semen analysis is skipping a step. This is also where an incomplete male fertility workup produces a false label: some couples are told they have unexplained infertility when the male side was never fully evaluated. A strong program finishes both workups before it uses that word.

The andrology lab: what to ask

The andrology lab is where sperm is analyzed and prepared, and its quality shapes every male-factor decision. The reference standard for how a semen analysis is performed and interpreted is the WHO laboratory manual, now in its sixth edition, which sets the values used to read concentration, motility, vitality, and morphology 3. A lab that follows it, and a clinic that repeats an abnormal result rather than acting on a single sample, is applying the current standard rather than an in-house shortcut.

Andrology is the laboratory and clinical field focused on male reproductive health, including semen analysis and sperm preparation.

Worth confirming: whether the semen analysis is done in-house or referred out, whether the lab uses current WHO reference values, whether it will repeat an abnormal result on a fresh sample, and how it prepares sperm for IUI or IVF. A clinic that cannot say who reads its semen analyses is telling you something.

The reference values matter because they changed. A result read against an older edition of the manual can look different from the same sample read against the sixth, so a lab that names the standard it uses is easier to trust. It is also fair to ask what the lab can do beyond the basic count — whether it offers sperm DNA fragmentation testing or specialized retrieval-day processing when those are indicated — since a fuller andrology capability is part of what separates a male-factor-strong program from one that outsources the hard cases.

Access to a reproductive urologist

The clearest marker of a male-factor-strong clinic is a reproductive urologist on staff or in a close referral relationship. This is the specialist who treats the male side directly. The joint guideline describes the range: medical and surgical options such as varicocele repair and hormonal treatment, and surgical sperm retrieval — including microdissection TESE — for men with no sperm in the ejaculate 4. Without that access, a clinic facing azoospermia can stall or push straight to donor sperm before the male partner has been properly treated.

It is reasonable to ask whether the clinic does its own surgical sperm retrieval or refers, who performs it, and how male hormone testing is handled when a result points toward a condition like hypogonadism. A program that can move from a diagnosis to the right treatment, in-house or through a trusted partner, is the one that keeps male factor from becoming a dead end.

ICSI and add-ons: the right tool, not the priciest

ICSI — injecting a single sperm directly into an egg — is the evidence-based answer to significant male factor, and this is exactly where it belongs. The professional position is that ICSI is justified by male factor or a prior fertilization failure, and that routine ICSI on every egg absent those reasons does not improve live-birth rates 5. So a strong clinic reaches for ICSI when the sperm warrants it, not as a blanket upgrade for everyone.

The same discipline applies to the wider menu of paid extras. The UK regulator rates common IVF add-ons and finds most lack good evidence of benefit, with some potentially harmful 6. A clinic genuinely strong on male factor treats the male problem with the tool the evidence supports — a proper workup, the right lab, ICSI where indicated — rather than selling a stack of unproven add-ons on top.

When there's a female factor too, or the workup is 'unexplained'

Male factor rarely exists in a vacuum, and a good clinic keeps evaluating both partners even after it finds a sperm problem. A coexisting tubal factor, for example — blocked fallopian tubes on the female side — changes the plan, and missing it because attention shifted entirely to the male partner is its own kind of incomplete workup. The strongest programs hold both pictures at once.

Inclusive care is part of this too. A clinic's approach to donor sperm, and its comfort with lgbtq+ clinic vetting questions, tells you how it handles male-factor and family-building situations beyond the textbook case. And because everyday habits that lower sperm count are modifiable, a thorough program will address them as part of the workup rather than skipping straight to a procedure. The throughline is completeness: a clinic strong on male factor treats the male partner as a patient, not a sample.

Common questions

An andrologist typically works in the laboratory, analyzing and preparing sperm, while a reproductive urologist is a physician who diagnoses and treats male reproductive problems — including surgery such as varicocele repair and sperm retrieval. A male-factor-strong clinic usually has both: a capable andrology lab and access to a reproductive urologist who can treat what the lab findings reveal.

It depends on the findings. Many couples are managed within a fertility clinic, but a significantly abnormal semen analysis, no sperm in the ejaculate, or a result suggesting an underlying condition warrants a reproductive urologist's evaluation. That specialist can also find treatable causes and screen for serious conditions male infertility sometimes signals. A clinic that can refer or provide that access promptly is a good sign.

Sperm parameters vary from sample to sample, so a single result — especially an abnormal one — can be misleading. Repeating the analysis on a fresh sample, usually weeks apart, gives a truer picture before major decisions. A clinic that acts on one abnormal result without confirming it, or one that will not repeat a borderline test, is not applying the standard carefully.

ICSI is the evidence-based tool for significant male factor and prior fertilization failure, so it is often used there. But routine ICSI on every egg, absent those reasons, does not improve live-birth rates. A strong clinic uses ICSI when the sperm findings justify it and can explain why it applies to your case, rather than adding it as a default upgrade for everyone.

Often, yes. No sperm in the ejaculate does not necessarily mean no sperm at all; surgical sperm retrieval, including microdissection TESE, can sometimes recover sperm for use with ICSI. This requires a reproductive urologist. When vetting a clinic for male factor, it is worth asking specifically how azoospermia is handled and who performs any retrieval.

Related

Say it back

How would you explain this to someone you love?

Two or three sentences, just as you’d say it. Gale reflects back what you focused on — a mirror, not a quiz.

Talk to a clinician

Gale can help you find a clinician in your state and request a visit.

Find care →

When the male side needs more attention

  • A new lump, mass, or swelling in a testicle — this warrants prompt medical evaluation regardless of fertility plans
  • A clinic starting the female partner on treatment before the male partner has had a semen analysis
  • Azoospermia, or a markedly abnormal semen result, handled without referral to a reproductive urologist
  • An abnormal male workup that is never repeated or that skips evaluation for an underlying hormonal or testicular cause

This is general educational information about evaluating a fertility clinic's strength on male factor, not medical advice about any individual's care or a judgment about any specific clinic. Diagnosis and treatment depend on individual findings; discuss your situation with a qualified clinician, including a reproductive urologist where indicated.

References

  1. 1.American Urological Association / American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2020). Diagnosis and treatment of infertility in men: AUA/ASRM guideline part I. AUA/ASRM (Fertility and Sterility; Journal of Urology). PMID 33295257That the male partner should be evaluated concurrently with the female partner, with semen analyses, and that male infertility can be the first sign of a serious underlying condition such as testicular cancer, a pituitary tumor, or a hormone disorder.
  2. 2.Practice Committee of ASRM (2021). Fertility evaluation of infertile women: a committee opinion. American Society for Reproductive Medicine (Fertility and Sterility). linkThat the standard female fertility evaluation includes concurrent evaluation of the male partner, so the male workup is meant to run alongside the female one.
  3. 3.World Health Organization (2021). WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen, 6th edition. World Health Organization. linkThat the WHO laboratory manual is the reference standard for how a semen analysis is performed and interpreted, setting the reference values used for concentration, motility, vitality, and morphology.
  4. 4.American Urological Association / American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2020). Diagnosis and treatment of infertility in men: AUA/ASRM guideline part II. AUA/ASRM (Fertility and Sterility; Journal of Urology). linkThat management of male-factor infertility includes medical and surgical options such as varicocele repair and hormonal treatment, and surgical sperm retrieval — including microdissection TESE — for men with no sperm in the ejaculate.
  5. 5.Practice Committees of ASRM and SART (2026). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection for nonmale factor indications: a committee opinion. American Society for Reproductive Medicine (Fertility and Sterility). linkThat ICSI is justified by male factor or prior fertilization failure, and that routine ICSI on all oocytes absent those indications does not improve live-birth rates.
  6. 6.Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (2024). Treatment add-ons with limited evidence. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (UK). linkThat most common IVF add-ons lack good evidence of benefit and some may be harmful, so unproven extras are not a substitute for the evidence-based treatment of male factor.

6 sources, numbered by first appearance. General health information, not medical advice. AI-assisted editorial content — citations link their sources. Editorial policy