Skin & hair

The Newer Eczema Biologics Beyond Dupilumab

Save

When a topical eczema routine — moisturizer, steroid cream, maybe a calcineurin inhibitor — stops being enough, dupilumab isn't the only biologic option anymore. Tralokinumab and lebrikizumab work by narrowing in on interleukin-13 specifically, offering an alternative path into the same systemic treatment tier for people whose eczema hasn't responded to, or can't use, other options.

Last updated: July 2026

Talk to a clinician

Gale can help you find a clinician in your state and request a visit.

Find care →

What Tralokinumab and Lebrikizumab Are

Tralokinumab and lebrikizumab are both injectable biologic medications that target interleukin-13 (IL-13), an inflammatory signaling protein involved in the immune overactivity that drives atopic dermatitis, and both belong to the systemic biologic tier of eczema treatment covered by current dermatology guidelines 1. They are self-injected on a regular schedule after an initial training period, the same delivery format used for other biologics in this class.

Interleukin-13 (IL-13) is one signaling protein among several involved in eczema's underlying inflammation, and targeting it specifically is the shared mechanism behind both drugs, even though they come from different manufacturers and aren't interchangeable prescriptions. Neither is a cream, a pill, or a short course — both are ongoing treatments meant to be continued as long as they're working and well tolerated, similar to how other biologics in dermatology are used long-term rather than for a fixed number of weeks.

Where They Fit on the Eczema Treatment Ladder

Eczema treatment generally follows a ladder: moisturizers and gentle skin care first, then topical corticosteroids or topical calcineurin inhibitors, and only after those haven't controlled the disease does a systemic option like a biologic enter the conversation 2. Tralokinumab and lebrikizumab sit at that same systemic step, alongside dupilumab and the oral JAK inhibitors, rather than replacing any of the topical steps that come before it 1.

Oral JAK inhibitors for eczema occupy the same tier but in pill form rather than as an injection, which is one of the practical differences a prescriber and patient weigh together — needle aversion versus a daily pill and its own monitoring requirements are both reasonable factors in that conversation, not a medical judgment one way or the other.

How an IL-13-Specific Biologic Compares to Dupilumab

Dupilumab, the first biologic approved for eczema, was established through large placebo-controlled trials showing clear improvement in skin clearance, itch, and quality of life for adults with moderate-to-severe disease not adequately controlled by topical therapy 3. Tralokinumab and lebrikizumab arrived several years later, developed to act on the IL-13 signal within that same broader inflammatory pathway, and are addressed within the same class of systemic biologic options current dermatology guidelines cover 1.

Because both newer drugs are more recent to market, they simply have a shorter real-world track record than dupilumab, whose original trials remain some of the most cited efficacy data in the class 3. A shorter track record isn't the same as a weaker one — it mostly means less accumulated real-world experience, which is one factor, among several, that a prescriber may weigh.

Why Someone Might Be Offered One Instead of Dupilumab

The choice between dupilumab and a newer IL-13-specific biologic is not usually about one being uniformly stronger than the other — it more often comes down to insurance formulary coverage, how a person responded to or tolerated a prior biologic, and a prescriber's read of the individual case 1. Someone whose eczema didn't respond adequately to one option in this class is sometimes tried on another rather than moving straight to a different treatment category entirely.

This is part of why eczema systemic options are best discussed as a group rather than a single default choice: dupilumab vs a JAK inhibitor for eczema is one comparison a prescriber might walk through, and dupilumab vs an IL-13-specific biologic is another, with the right answer depending on a specific person's history rather than a universal ranking.

Part of a Broader Pattern in Immune-Mediated Skin Disease

Eczema's expanding biologic options mirror a pattern already established in psoriasis, where treatment moved from broad TNF inhibitors toward increasingly targeted IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors as the biologic class matured and more specific inflammatory targets were identified 4. The same trend — narrower, more specific targets supplementing broader ones — is now playing out in eczema treatment as tralokinumab and lebrikizumab join dupilumab in the systemic tier.

Choosing among the psoriasis biologics has followed a similar logic for years: no single agent is uniformly first-choice, and the decision rests on disease pattern, comorbidities, and individual response 4. Eczema's biologic landscape is still younger than psoriasis's, but it appears to be following the same trajectory toward more, and more targeted, options over time.

What Starting One of These Biologics Involves

Starting a biologic for eczema typically involves a discussion of disease severity, prior treatment history, and any relevant health conditions, followed by training on self-injection technique before the first dose is given independently 1. Ongoing follow-up tracks how well the skin and itch are responding, since the systemic tier is reserved for disease that topical treatment alone couldn't control.

Most people continue at least some topical care alongside the biologic rather than stopping it entirely, since a biologic addresses the underlying immune signal while moisturizing continues to support the skin barrier itself. Response is usually assessed over a period of months rather than days, and a plan that isn't working is adjusted rather than abandoned outright.

The specific follow-up schedule — how often check-ins happen, what gets reassessed at each one, and how long before a treatment is judged as working or not — is set by the prescribing clinician based on the individual case and the guideline in effect, rather than following a single fixed calendar for everyone on this drug class 1.

The Underlying Condition These Biologics Are Treating

Atopic dermatitis, the clinical term for the eczema these biologics treat, is driven by a combination of immune system overactivity and a skin barrier that doesn't hold onto moisture the way it should, and it often runs alongside other atopic conditions like asthma, food allergy, or allergic rhinitis 5. Biologics like tralokinumab and lebrikizumab intervene on the immune-overactivity side of that equation rather than the barrier side.

That division is why moisturizing and gentle skin care remain part of the plan even after someone starts a biologic — the injection and the daily skin-care routine are addressing two different parts of the same condition, not competing approaches.

Common questions

Both are given as an injection under the skin, typically self-administered after a prescriber or nurse walks through the technique. Most people start with an initial series given more frequently, then move to a maintenance schedule the prescriber sets based on how the eczema responds.

Switching within this biologic class does happen, usually when one option isn't controlling the eczema well enough or isn't well tolerated, rather than as a routine first choice. That decision is made together with a prescriber weighing how the current treatment is going, not something to change independently.

No, they're different medications from different manufacturers, though both target the same inflammatory signal, interleukin-13, and both sit in the same systemic biologic tier of eczema treatment alongside dupilumab. The similarity is in their mechanism and place in the treatment ladder, not their formulation.

Not necessarily — which biologic comes first often depends on insurance coverage and a prescriber's assessment rather than a strict required order. What generally does come first, regardless of which biologic is eventually used, is a genuine trial of topical treatment that didn't control the disease.

Yes — oral JAK inhibitors sit in the same systemic treatment tier for eczema that isn't controlled by topical therapy, offering a pill instead of an injection. Each option carries its own monitoring considerations, which a prescriber weighs against the biologic route for a given person.

Related

Say it back

How would you explain this to someone you love?

Two or three sentences, just as you’d say it. Gale reflects back what you focused on — a mirror, not a quiz.

Talk to a clinician

Gale can help you find a clinician in your state and request a visit.

Find care →

When to Loop In a Prescriber

  • Signs of infection — fever, spreading redness, warmth, or pus — appearing while on any biologic treatment
  • New or worsening eye redness, irritation, or vision changes after starting treatment
  • No meaningful improvement in itch or skin clearing after several months on a biologic
  • A reaction at the injection site that spreads, blisters, or doesn't settle within a few days

This article explains general treatment patterns for eczema biologics and is not a treatment recommendation. A dermatologist or prescriber familiar with a person's full history and insurance coverage determines which biologic, if any, fits.

References

  1. 1.Sidbury R, Davis DM, Alikhan A, et al. (2024). Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis in adults with phototherapy and systemic therapies. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. PMID 37943240Systemic/biologic tier of eczema treatment including dupilumab and other biologics, reserved for moderate-to-severe disease not controlled by topical therapy.
  2. 2.Sidbury R, Alikhan A, Bercovitch L, et al. (2023). Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis in adults with topical therapies. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2022.12.029First-line topical treatment steps (moisturizers, topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors) that precede systemic/biologic treatment on the eczema ladder.
  3. 3.Simpson EL, Bieber T, Guttman-Yassky E, et al. (2016). Two Phase 3 Trials of Dupilumab versus Placebo in Atopic Dermatitis. New England Journal of Medicine. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1610020Dupilumab's trial-established efficacy for signs, symptoms, itch, and quality of life in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, as the comparator with the longest track record in this drug class.
  4. 4.American Academy of Dermatology; National Psoriasis Foundation (2019). Joint AAD-NPF guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with biologics. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. PMID 30772098Cross-disease analogy: psoriasis biologic treatment evolving from broad TNF inhibitors toward more targeted IL-17/IL-23 inhibitors, with no single agent uniformly first-choice.
  5. 5.National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (2024). Eczema (Atopic Dermatitis). NIH / NIAID. linkGeneral definitional background: atopic dermatitis driven by immune dysregulation and skin-barrier dysfunction, associated with the atopic march (asthma, food allergy, allergic rhinitis).

5 sources, numbered by first appearance. General health information, not medical advice. AI-assisted editorial content — citations link their sources. Editorial policy