Sleep

Valerian Root and What the Studies Show

Save

Valerian root has been used as a sleep aid for centuries and is one of the few supplements formally reviewed by a major sleep-medicine guideline. This article covers what that guideline concluded, how valerian's evidence compares to other options people try, and what has considerably stronger support for chronic insomnia.

Last updated: July 2026

Talk to a clinician

Gale can help you find a clinician in your state and request a visit.

Find care →

Does valerian root actually help you sleep?

The clearest answer available comes from a formal guideline review, not from tradition or popularity. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine's 2017 pharmacologic guideline evaluated valerian directly, alongside melatonin, trazodone, diphenhydramine, and tryptophan, and recommended against routine use of each one for chronic insomnia, citing little or insufficient evidence 1.

that verdict reflects inconsistent trial results and study-quality problems, not a large, well-run trial that found valerian ineffective. Many valerian studies are small, use different extracts and preparation methods, and measure sleep outcomes differently from one another — part of why guideline reviewers landed on 'not enough evidence' rather than a clean yes or no.

Why valerian has been used for so long anyway

Valerian is an herbal supplement derived from the root of Valeriana officinalis, and it has a long history of use for anxiety and sleep going back centuries, well before modern clinical trials existed to test it formally. That history is part of why it remains popular and widely sold as capsules, teas, and tinctures, even though the modern evidence base hasn't caught up to the reputation.

A long history of use is a reasonable starting point for interest in a supplement, but it isn't the same thing as evidence of effectiveness. Plenty of traditional remedies turn out to help; plenty turn out to do little beyond the ritual of taking them.

How valerian compares to other supplements that have been studied

Valerian isn't unusual in landing in this weak-evidence category. A meta-analysis of oral magnesium for insomnia in older adults, pooling three randomized trials, found only a small, low-certainty reduction in the time it took to fall asleep 2 — a similarly modest result to what valerian research tends to show when it's positive at all.

That pattern is the honest answer to do natural sleep supplements actually work: a few show small, inconsistent signals in small trials, and none has the kind of large, well-designed trial base that would support a confident recommendation.

Where valerian sits next to off-label medications

People choosing between valerian and a prescription option are often comparing two different kinds of weak evidence. A systematic review of low-dose trazodone for insomnia found modest efficacy on sleep continuity, but also limited high-quality data, despite trazodone having no FDA indication for insomnia at all 3. Neither valerian nor trazodone has the kind of evidence base that would make one a clearly better-supported choice than the other on efficacy grounds alone.

The difference that matters more is safety and interactions, which is a question for a pharmacist rather than a comparison of trial data — herbal supplements are not risk-free simply because they're sold without a prescription.

What has considerably stronger evidence

Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the approach with by far the strongest evidence base for chronic insomnia. A meta-analysis of 20 randomized trials found CBT-I produced clinically meaningful, durable improvements in sleep-onset latency and time spent awake after falling asleep 4, and a companion systematic review graded with formal methodology reached the same conclusion about its individual components 5.

For people who'd rather not add another supplement to the routine, cbt-i vs sleeping pills comparisons consistently favor the therapy on durability, and digital cbt-i options have made it far more accessible than it used to be.

Practical questions before trying valerian

Before adding valerian to a nightly routine, it's worth asking what specific sleep problem is being targeted, how long it's been going on, and whether it fits the pattern of chronic insomnia — trouble sleeping most nights for more than a few weeks — rather than a short stretch of stress-related bad sleep. About a third of adults report insomnia symptoms at some point, and a smaller share, roughly 9 to 15 percent, have insomnia with real daytime consequences 6, which is the group least likely to be well served by an unproven supplement alone.

Valerian can also interact with other sedating medications and with alcohol, so mentioning it to a pharmacist or prescriber is a reasonable step, particularly for anyone taking several medications already. trying valerian and finding it doesn't do much is common, and it doesn't mean nothing will work. It usually means the next step is an approach with a stronger evidence base.

Common questions

No. The American Academy of Sleep Medicine's pharmacologic guideline reviewed valerian directly and recommended against its routine use for chronic insomnia, citing little or insufficient evidence — the same verdict it gave melatonin, trazodone, and several other over-the-counter options.

Studies use different valerian extracts, preparation methods, and doses, and measure sleep outcomes in different ways, which makes it hard to pool the results into a confident conclusion. That inconsistency, not a single large negative trial, is why guideline reviewers landed on insufficient evidence.

That's not something the efficacy evidence can answer, since valerian hasn't been through the same kind of safety-focused trial process as an FDA-approved drug. It can also interact with other sedating medications and alcohol, which is worth raising with a pharmacist.

Valerian root has a documented history of use for anxiety and sleep going back centuries, well before modern clinical trials existed. That long history explains its popularity, but it isn't a substitute for the kind of evidence a guideline review looks for.

Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) has a considerably stronger and more consistent evidence base, with durable improvements shown across multiple large trials, and it doesn't carry the interaction risks a supplement can.

Related

Say it back

How would you explain this to someone you love?

Two or three sentences, just as you’d say it. Gale reflects back what you focused on — a mirror, not a quiz.

If things feel heavy, a person is available anytime — call or text 988.

Talk to a clinician

Gale can help you find a clinician in your state and request a visit.

Find care →

When to loop in a clinician

  • daytime drowsiness or headache that doesn't improve after a few nights of taking valerian
  • combining valerian with alcohol, benzodiazepines, or another sedating medication
  • sleep trouble most nights for more than a few weeks — that pattern points to chronic insomnia, not a supplement question

This article is educational and does not replace personalized medical advice. Talk with a pharmacist or clinician before combining valerian with other medications.

References

  1. 1.Sateia MJ, Buysse DJ, Krystal AD, Neubauer DN, Heald JL (2017). Clinical Practice Guideline for the Pharmacologic Treatment of Chronic Insomnia in Adults: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. doi:10.5664/jcsm.6470Supports that guidelines suggest against valerian for chronic insomnia due to little or insufficient evidence, the article's core sourced verdict.
  2. 2.Mah J, Pitre T (2021). Oral magnesium supplementation for insomnia in older adults: a Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies. doi:10.1186/s12906-021-03297-zSupports the honest 'magnesium evidence for sleep is weak/low-certainty' framing, used as a comparison point for valerian's similarly modest evidence.
  3. 3.Jaffer KY, Chang T, Vanle B, et al. (2017). Trazodone for Insomnia: A Systematic Review. Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience. linkSupports that trazodone is used off-label for insomnia with modest, low-quality evidence, used as a comparison point against valerian's evidence base.
  4. 4.Trauer JM, Qian MY, Doyle JS, Rajaratnam SMW, Cunnington D (2015). Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Insomnia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine. doi:10.7326/M14-2841Supports the magnitude of CBT-I's benefit on sleep-diary measures, used to contrast a well-evidenced alternative against valerian.
  5. 5.Edinger JD, Arnedt JT, Bertisch SM, et al. (2021). Behavioral and psychological treatments for chronic insomnia disorder in adults: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. doi:10.5664/jcsm.8988Supports the graded strength-of-evidence behind CBT-I's individual components as the best-evidenced alternative to valerian.
  6. 6.Ohayon MM (2002). Epidemiology of insomnia: what we know and what we still need to learn. Sleep Medicine Reviews. doi:10.1053/smrv.2002.0186Supports the insomnia-prevalence figures (about a third report symptoms; 9-15% have insomnia with daytime consequences) used to frame who is least likely to be served by a supplement alone.

6 sources, numbered by first appearance. General health information, not medical advice. AI-assisted editorial content — every citation independently verified. Editorial policy