Fertility

Does Delaware Require Insurance to Cover IVF?

Save

Delaware's fertility-care law, signed in 2018, made it the sixteenth state to require IVF coverage and only the fourth to also require coverage of fertility preservation such as egg or sperm freezing before cancer treatment. The mandate reaches further than most: donor eggs, donor embryos, and cases involving a gestational carrier are included. It also carves out real exceptions, for small employers, self-funded plans, and religious organizations.

Last updated: July 2026

Talk to a clinician

Gale can help you find a clinician in your state and request a visit.

Find care →

What Delaware's Fertility-Care Law Covers

Delaware's mandate, enacted in 2018 as the Fertility Care and Preservation Act, requires individual, group, and blanket health insurance policies that cover medical or hospital expenses to also cover fertility care, including in vitro fertilization 1. The law covers up to six completed egg retrievals in a lifetime, with unlimited embryo transfers from those retrievals.

That scope extends further than most state mandates. Coverage explicitly includes IVF performed with donor eggs or donor embryos, and it extends to arrangements involving a gestational carrier, rather than limiting the benefit to a policyholder's own eggs and a spouse's sperm the way some older state laws do. Delaware was the sixteenth state to require IVF coverage and only the fourth to also require coverage of fertility preservation, such as freezing eggs or sperm before chemotherapy or another treatment likely to cause iatrogenic infertility. The fertility-preservation piece stands apart from the IVF benefit: it applies whenever a covered treatment threatens future fertility as a side effect, regardless of whether the person has any prior infertility diagnosis at all.

How the Retrieval and Transfer Limits Work

Unlike a state that caps the number of IVF cycles, Delaware counts by completed egg retrieval: up to six in a lifetime, with no separate limit on how many embryo transfers follow from them 1. A single retrieval that produces several viable embryos can support multiple transfer attempts, all counted against the same limit rather than a fresh cycle cap each time.

The law also limits how much a plan can require before IVF itself is covered. No more than three cycles of ovulation induction or intrauterine insemination may be required first, and if IVF is medically necessary, a plan cannot require any prior treatment cycles at all before covering it. Retrievals must be completed before the covered person turns 45; transfers must be completed before age 50. Because Delaware does not cap embryos per transfer the way some states do, how many embryos to transfer in any cycle is left to the clinical team and patient, guided by professional single-embryo-transfer recommendations aimed at reducing the risk of a multiple pregnancy 2.

Who Is Exempt

Delaware carves out three groups from the mandate: employers who self-insure, employers with fewer than 50 employees, and religious organizations 1. Self-insured plans are exempt because they are regulated under the federal ERISA law, which preempts state insurance mandates; the small-employer and religious exemptions are written into Delaware's statute itself, which is less common; several other states' mandates apply regardless of employer size.

For a person covered by a small employer's fully insured plan, the mandate simply does not apply, no different in practice than being on a self-funded plan at a much larger company. Checking employer size and funding type together, not just whether the plan is "fully insured," is necessary to know whether Delaware's law reaches a specific policy. An employee count that hovers near the 50-employee line is also worth rechecking each plan year, since a company that grows past that threshold can move from exempt to covered without changing insurers.

No Different Cost-Sharing Than Other Care

Delaware's law does something several other states' mandates do not: it bars an insurer from applying different deductibles, copays, coinsurance, benefit maximums, or waiting periods to fertility care than it applies to other covered medical services 1. It also prohibits treating fertility medications differently from other prescription drugs on the plan's formulary.

In practice, that means a covered IVF cycle in Delaware should be billed under the same cost-sharing structure as any other major covered procedure, rather than facing a separate, higher fertility-specific coinsurance rate. It does not mean the cycle is free: whatever deductible and coinsurance apply to comparable care on that plan still apply here, and out-of-network care can still cost more than in-network care regardless of the mandate, and travel or lodging for treatment are never part of what any state mandate requires an insurer to pay.

What a Mandate Still Doesn't Guarantee

Even a broad mandate does not erase the cost of infertility care. A study following patients through eighteen months of treatment found that out-of-pocket spending rose steeply as care moved toward IVF, and total costs climbed further for anyone who did not reach a live birth within the study period 3. A generous mandate lowers the bill; it does not guarantee an outcome or a cost of zero.

Retrieval-cycle limits, the age cutoffs at 45 and 50, and the small-employer and self-funded exemptions all still leave real gaps. Someone whose retrievals are complete before 45 but who needs a transfer after that age remains covered under Delaware's law, since the age limits attach to the type of procedure, not to a single birthday governing the whole benefit.

Comparing Coverage in Other States

Delaware's mandate does not extend to a policy issued in another state, even for the same employer. Coverage never follows a person automatically between states: RESOLVE's state infertility mandate overview is built to answer does health insurance cover ivf for each state individually, which makes it a faster comparison than reading fifty separate statutes 1.

ivf coverage in arizona, ivf coverage in arkansas, and ivf coverage in california each rest on entirely different statutory language than Delaware's six-retrieval, unlimited-transfer structure, and none of them share Delaware's age cutoffs or its small-employer exemption. A plan document from the actual employer, not a general assumption about the state, remains the only way to confirm what applies. Someone relocating for work, or comparing two job offers in different states, is usually better served by requesting both summary plan descriptions than by relying on either state's reputation for generosity.

Common questions

Delaware counts by egg retrieval rather than by cycle: up to six completed retrievals in a lifetime, with no separate cap on how many embryo transfers follow from them. A single retrieval that yields multiple viable embryos can support several transfer attempts without using up another retrieval. Retrievals must be completed before age 45, and transfers before age 50.

Yes. Delaware's law explicitly extends to IVF using donor eggs or donor embryos, and to arrangements involving a gestational carrier, rather than limiting the benefit to a policyholder's own eggs. That is broader than several other states' mandates, which sometimes require the covered person's own eggs and a spouse's sperm.

Not necessarily. Delaware exempts employers with fewer than 50 employees, along with self-insured plans and religious organizations, from the mandate. A small business's fully insured plan can lawfully exclude fertility coverage even though the same benefit would be required for a larger, similarly insured employer in the state.

Yes, and this is one of the more distinctive parts of Delaware's law. It requires coverage of standard fertility preservation services for anyone undergoing medically necessary treatment, such as chemotherapy, that may cause iatrogenic infertility. Delaware was only the fourth state to require this kind of coverage when its law passed.

No. Delaware's law specifically bars insurers from applying different restrictions, deductibles, copays, or coinsurance to fertility medications than they apply to other covered prescription drugs. The same rule applies to other cost-sharing terms for fertility care generally, compared with other covered medical services on the same plan.

Related

Say it back

How would you explain this to someone you love?

Two or three sentences, just as you’d say it. Gale reflects back what you focused on — a mirror, not a quiz.

Talk to a clinician

Gale can help you find a clinician in your state and request a visit.

Find care →

What to check before assuming you're covered

  • your employer has fewer than 50 employees, or the plan documents say "self-insured" — Delaware's mandate does not reach either situation
  • a claim for a donor-egg or gestational-carrier IVF cycle is denied outright, despite Delaware's law explicitly including both — that denial is worth appealing
  • an egg retrieval is scheduled close to your 45th birthday, or a transfer close to your 50th, without your insurer confirming which side of the cutoff it falls on

This is general information about Delaware insurance law, not legal or financial advice. Plan terms vary by policy; confirming coverage always requires reading the specific plan document or asking its administrator directly.

References

  1. 1.RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association (2024). RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association — Insurance Coverage and Support Resources. RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association. linkState-by-state variability of infertility insurance mandates, including Delaware's scope (donor gametes, gestational carriers, fertility preservation), its cost-sharing parity rule, and its employer-size and self-insured exemptions.
  2. 2.Practice Committee of ASRM and SART (2022). Multiple gestation associated with infertility therapy: a committee opinion. American Society for Reproductive Medicine (Fertility and Sterility). linkWhy professional guidance favors transferring fewer embryos per cycle to reduce the risk of multiple gestation, relevant where state law does not itself cap embryos per transfer.
  3. 3.Katz P, Showstack J, Smith JF, et al. (2011). Costs of infertility treatment: results from an 18-month prospective cohort study. Fertility and Sterility. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.026That out-of-pocket infertility costs are substantial and rise steeply toward IVF, even where a state mandate exists.

3 sources, numbered by first appearance. General health information, not medical advice. AI-assisted editorial content — citations link their sources. Editorial policy