Muscle, joint & pain

How Long You'll Need Crutches After Hip Arthroscopy

Save

Hip arthroscopy is a smaller incision than open hip surgery, but the crutch phase afterward still surprises a lot of people, partly because the timeline genuinely varies by what was fixed inside the joint. Here is what determines how long crutches stick around, and how surgeons decide when full weight-bearing is safe.

Last updated: July 2026

Talk to a clinician

Gale can help you find a clinician in your state and request a visit.

Find care →

What determines the length of the crutch phase?

The single biggest factor is what procedure was actually performed during the arthroscopy, since "hip arthroscopy" describes an approach, not one specific repair. A labral tear repair, common in femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) surgery, typically calls for a longer period of protected or partial weight-bearing than a simple debridement, because the repaired labral tissue needs time to heal before it can tolerate full body-weight load through the joint. Procedures that also reshape the bone of the hip socket or femoral neck to correct impingement add their own healing timeline on top of the soft-tissue repair. Surgeon preference and the specific surgical technique used also shape the exact protocol, which is why two people having what sounds like the same surgery can walk away with different crutch instructions.

What is hip arthroscopy actually treating?

Most commonly, femoroacetabular impingement syndrome — a mismatch between the shape of the hip socket and the top of the thigh bone that causes pinching and, often, damage to the labrum (the cartilage rim around the socket) with certain hip positions. This is a different condition from hip osteoarthritis, where the cartilage lining the joint itself has broken down and pain tends to be more constant and progressive with age 1. That distinction matters for recovery: FAI surgery in appropriately selected, usually younger and more active patients has real evidence behind it. A large multicenter randomized trial found that hip arthroscopy for FAI produced modestly better patient-reported hip function at one year than a structured, physiotherapist-led conservative-care program, though at meaningfully higher cost 2. The randomized comparison found a real but modest surgical advantage, not a dramatic one — a useful thing to know going in, since it sets realistic expectations for how much better the joint should feel a year out.

Is hip arthroscopy different from the arthroscopy debate in knees?

Yes, and worth understanding because the two get lumped together in casual conversation. For degenerative knee conditions — meniscal tears in an aging, arthritic knee — clinical practice guidelines actually recommend against arthroscopic surgery for nearly all patients, because trial evidence shows little to no meaningful benefit over conservative care 3. Hip arthroscopy for FAI in a properly selected younger patient with a structural impingement problem is a different clinical picture, with trial evidence showing a real, if modest, functional benefit over conservative care 2. That distinction is one reason a surgeon's recommendation for hip arthroscopy is not automatically comparable to the more skeptical evidence base around knee arthroscopy for degenerative disease.

What does a typical crutch progression actually look like?

While exact protocols vary by surgeon and by what was repaired, a common pattern is partial or protected weight-bearing on crutches for roughly one to four weeks, with a gradual transition to one crutch and then none as pain allows and the surgeon clears fuller weight-bearing. Some people are advanced off crutches within days after a straightforward debridement without a labral repair; others, particularly after a more extensive labral repair or bony reshaping, stay on crutches closer to the full four weeks. The surgeon's specific weight-bearing instructions, tied to what was actually done in the joint, matter far more than any general timeline found online, and following them precisely protects the repair during the window it is most vulnerable.

What happens after crutches come off?

Coming off crutches is a milestone, not a finish line. Most rehabilitation protocols move next into restoring a normal walking pattern without a limp, then rebuilding hip and core strength, before any return to higher-impact activity or sport is considered. Rushing back to running, pivoting sports, or heavy loading before strength and movement quality have caught up is a common way people re-aggravate the joint even after the crutch phase has technically ended.

What slows this timeline down?

Putting more weight through the leg than instructed, before tissue has had time to heal, is the most common way people extend their own recovery — pain is not always a reliable warning sign in the first couple of weeks, since surgical anesthesia and pain medication can mask how much stress the joint is actually under. Swelling that does not settle, persistent groin pain well beyond what feels like ordinary post-surgical soreness, or a limp that is not gradually improving are all reasons to check in with the surgical team rather than simply pushing through on the assumption that more time alone will fix it.

Common questions

Typically somewhere between a few days and four weeks, depending mainly on what procedure was performed. A simple debridement usually allows a faster return to full weight-bearing than a labral repair or bony reshaping, which needs more protected time to heal.

A large randomized trial found that hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement produced modestly better hip function at one year than structured conservative care with a physiotherapist, though the difference was real but not dramatic, and came at higher cost.

What sounds like the same procedure can vary considerably — a labral repair, bony reshaping, and a simple cleanup of damaged tissue all heal differently, and surgeon preference and technique also shape the specific protocol. The surgeon's individual instructions matter more than any general timeline.

This depends on what was repaired and should follow the surgeon's specific instructions rather than a fixed calendar date. Progressing weight-bearing before tissue is ready is one of the more common ways people slow down their own recovery.

No. Guidelines recommend against knee arthroscopy for degenerative, arthritic knee conditions because trials show little benefit. Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in appropriately selected, usually younger patients has different, more supportive randomized trial evidence behind it.

Related

Say it back

How would you explain this to someone you love?

Two or three sentences, just as you’d say it. Gale reflects back what you focused on — a mirror, not a quiz.

Talk to a clinician

Gale can help you find a clinician in your state and request a visit.

Find care →

When to check in with the surgical team

  • —Groin or hip pain that is worsening rather than gradually improving on schedule
  • —Swelling that is increasing rather than settling, especially with warmth or redness
  • —A limp that is not slowly improving as weeks pass
  • —Fever, or drainage or redness at the incision sites

This article is educational and does not replace the specific weight-bearing and rehabilitation instructions given by the surgeon who performed the procedure. Anyone with new or worsening symptoms after hip arthroscopy should contact their surgical team.

References

  1. 1.American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (OrthoInfo) (2024). Osteoarthritis of the Hip. OrthoInfo — AAOS. link ✓Hip osteoarthritis causes progressive groin/hip pain from cartilage breakdown, distinguishing it from the structural impingement problem hip arthroscopy for FAI addresses.
  2. 2.Griffin DR, Dickenson EJ, Wall PDH, et al. (UK FASHIoN) (2018). Hip arthroscopy versus best conservative care for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (UK FASHIoN): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31202-9Hip arthroscopy for FAI led to modestly better patient-reported hip function at 12 months than structured conservative care, at higher cost.
  3. 3.Siemieniuk RAC, Harris IA, Agoritsas T, et al. (2017). Arthroscopic surgery for degenerative knee arthritis and meniscal tears: a clinical practice guideline. BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.j1982Guidelines recommend against arthroscopy for degenerative knee disease, contrasted here with the more supportive trial evidence for hip arthroscopy in FAI.

3 sources, numbered by first appearance. General health information, not medical advice. AI-assisted editorial content — citations link their sources. Editorial policy

← Back to the health library