Senior living & memory care

CCRC Contract Types A, B, and C Compared

Save

Three contract types, one question underneath them: if a resident needs years of nursing care, whose money pays for it? A life-care contract answers "the community's, mostly, prepaid." A fee-for-service contract answers "yours, at the going rate." The entrance fee is what that answer costs, and the letters on the brochure are industry shorthand rather than a standard anyone is bound to.

Last updated: July 2026

Talk to a clinician

Gale can help you find a clinician in your state and request a visit.

Find care →

What is a CCRC contract actually buying?

Two things at once: a place to live now, and a claim on care later. A continuing care retirement community puts independent living, assisted living, and nursing care on one campus, so a resident can move between levels of care without leaving the community 1. The contract decides what that later care costs — and that, not the apartment, is what the letters A, B, and C describe.

This is why a CCRC decision does not resemble choosing an apartment. It resembles buying insurance that happens to include housing. What is being priced is a future that has not happened yet: whether this person will need years of nursing care or none. Someone turning 65 today has roughly a 70% chance of needing some long-term services and supports in their remaining years 2 — the actuarial basis of a life-care contract, and why it costs what it costs.

The three contract types are three answers to one question — if a resident needs years of nursing care, who pays for it?

Type A (life care)Type B (modified)Type C (fee-for-service)
Entrance feeHighestMiddleLowest
Care includedHigher levels of care at little or no increase in the monthly feeA defined amount — a set number of days, or a discounted rateNone; every level billed at rates
Who carries the risk of long careThe communitySharedThe resident
Predictable monthly costMostMiddleLeast
Best case for the resident's financesNeeds a lot of careNeeds a moderate amountNeeds little or none

The table contains an uncomfortable symmetry. Type A is the right financial choice for the person who ends up needing years of skilled care. Type C is the right choice for the person who dies in their independent-living apartment having never needed more. Nobody knows in advance which person they are, and that is not a flaw in the products — it is what buying insurance means.

Type A: the life-care contract

A life-care contract charges a large entrance fee and a monthly fee, and in exchange the community provides assisted living and nursing care as needed, with the monthly fee staying at or near the independent-living rate. A resident who moves from an apartment to the nursing wing keeps paying roughly what they paid before. The care is, in effect, prepaid.

What is being bought is predictability. The monthly fee still rises with inflation and operating costs — a life-care contract is not a price freeze, and anyone who reads it as one has misread it. What it does is decouple the monthly fee from the resident's health. The step that wrecks budgets elsewhere in senior living, where a change in condition triggers a change in price, is the step a Type A contract is designed to remove.

Who it fits. The person for whom this contract is worth its price is the one who values not having to think about it, who has the assets to fund the entrance fee without stranding the rest of their plan, and who has reason to think they may live a long time with growing needs. Family history matters here in a way it does not for most financial decisions.

The cost of that predictability. The community is taking a real risk and has priced it; nobody hands out insurance below cost. A resident who never needs more than independent living pays substantially more under Type A than under Type C — that is the premium, and it bought something real even if it is never claimed. Whether the ccrc buy-in earns its price turns on facts about one person's health, assets, and tolerance for uncertainty, and deserves its own arithmetic rather than a rule of thumb.

Life care means the community absorbs the cost of higher levels of care rather than billing them at market rates. It does not mean the monthly fee never rises.

Type B: the modified contract

A modified contract sits between the other two. It charges a smaller entrance fee than life care and includes a defined amount of higher-level care — commonly a set number of nursing days, or care at a discounted rate rather than the market rate. Once that defined amount is used up, the resident pays the going rate for anything further.

The crucial detail is the word defined, and it is where families are surprised years later. "A defined amount" is not a category but a specific term in a specific contract, and two Type B contracts can differ enormously. One might include ninety nursing days per lifetime. Another might include unlimited assisted living but nothing in the nursing wing. Another might discount all levels by a stated percentage forever. All three are Type B.

How to read one. The question that produces a real answer is arithmetic, not conceptual: what exactly is included, measured in what units, and what does the very next unit cost after the included ones run out? A contract that includes sixty nursing days runs out on day sixty-one, and day sixty-one is what the family needs to know about now, while there is still a choice.

Who it fits. Someone wanting real protection against a moderate care need without paying the full life-care premium, who could still absorb a long nursing stay if the included benefit is exhausted. It is a partial hedge, and worth choosing knowingly as one rather than because it sat in the middle of a brochure.

Type C: the fee-for-service contract

A fee-for-service contract charges the lowest entrance fee and includes no care. The resident buys the housing and the guarantee of access to the campus's higher levels of care, then pays the market rate for that care whenever they use it. Assisted living is billed at the assisted living rate; nursing care is billed at the nursing rate.

What the entrance fee still buys here is worth naming, because it is easy to conclude the fee buys nothing. It buys priority access to the ccrc care continuum — a place in the assisted living or nursing wing when it is needed, without a search, without a waiting list, without moving to an unfamiliar building during a crisis. For many families the value of that is not financial at all. It is the value of not conducting a frantic tour of unknown facilities in the week after a stroke.

The exposure is unbounded. That is the honest description of Type C, and it is not a criticism. A resident who spends four years in skilled nursing pays for four years of skilled nursing at whatever it costs in year four. There is no cap. Choosing Type C is choosing to self-insure — a coherent strategy for someone with substantial assets, but only a strategy if chosen deliberately.

Who it fits. Someone wealthy enough that a long nursing stay would not threaten their plan, or who has other coverage for that risk, or who has weighed the odds and prefers to keep the capital. It also fits the family for whom the lower entrance fee makes the community reachable at all — with a clear understanding of what was traded away.

Type C's entrance fee buys access and the apartment, not care. The care risk stays with the resident, uncapped.

The entrance fee and what comes back

The entrance fee is the large upfront payment that distinguishes a CCRC from an ordinary rental, and its refund terms are a separate variable from the contract letter. The same Type A contract may be offered with a fully amortizing refund or a stated refundable percentage, at different prices. Letter and refund structure are independent choices, and both belong in the comparison.

Refund provisions generally take one of two shapes. In a declining or amortizing refund, the refundable share shrinks over the months of residency until it reaches zero — leave early and a substantial sum comes back; live there ten years and nothing does. In a stated-percentage refund, a fixed share returns to the resident or their estate whenever the contract ends, and the community charges more upfront for that promise. Neither is better in the abstract: one answers the risk of an early departure, the other what is left to heirs.

The promise is only as good as the promisor. This is the part of the analysis families skip because it feels morbid, and it is the part a federal review has already flagged. Entrance fees can be lost if a community closes or goes bankrupt; monthly fees can rise beyond what a resident can pay; and residents can face relocation 3. A refund clause is a claim against an organization, and if that organization fails, the clause is a claim against a bankruptcy estate. Whatever the paper says, the refund is worth what the community's finances make it worth.

A federal review of CCRCs identified three concrete resident risks: entrance fees lost to a closure or bankruptcy, monthly fees rising past affordability, and residents facing relocation 3.

What the letters don't tell you

That A, B, and C are conventions of the industry rather than legal categories anyone is required to honor. No authority audits whether a contract labelled Type A behaves like one. Communities increasingly market themselves as a life plan community and describe their contracts in their own language. The label is a starting point for a conversation, and the contract's own text is what governs.

The letter is a hypothesis. The contract is the evidence.

The carve-outs are where the letters break down. A contract can be genuinely Type A for skilled nursing and fee-for-service for memory care. That distinction is not academic: dementia is a loss of cognitive function severe enough to interfere with daily life, it ranges from mild to severe, and it becomes more common with age — roughly one-third of people 85 and older may have some form of it 4. A resident who enters a CCRC at 78 is entering a community where a meaningful share of residents will eventually need dementia care. If the life-care promise does not extend to the memory care unit, the promise has a hole in exactly the place the odds point.

Questions the letter cannot answer:

  • Does the care promise cover memory care, or only skilled nursing?
  • What happens if the campus's nursing wing is full when the resident needs it?
  • Does the promise cover care delivered off campus if it must be?
  • Can the community change the contract terms for existing residents?
  • What clinical criteria trigger a move between levels, and who decides — a physician, a community committee, or the resident and family?

That last question is the one that quietly determines the experience of living there. A community that can move a resident to a higher level of care unilaterally, and a community that cannot, are different places to live under identical letters.

What can go wrong

None of the risks named above is prevented by choosing a particular contract letter, because the letter allocates care risk and not counterparty risk. A resident hands a large sum to a single organization and holds a long-dated promise from it, often having sold the house that would otherwise have been their fallback. That concentration deserves the scrutiny a financial advisor would give it anywhere else.

Fee escalation is the quiet one. Bankruptcy is dramatic and rare. A monthly fee rising faster than a fixed income, year after year, is neither, and it can end a placement just as decisively. A Type A contract protects against health-driven increases, not inflation-driven ones. What the monthly fee increase has been in each of the last five years, and what the contract permits, is worth asking of every community regardless of letter.

Diligence is not an insult. Audited financial statements, the disclosure statement given to prospective residents, occupancy trends, and the operator's debt position are all fair to ask about, and a CPA or elder-law attorney reads them faster and better than a family can. Because the campus's nursing tier is a nursing home, the public quality data that applies to nursing homes applies to it — including staffing hours per resident day, which is reported from payroll records rather than self-reported, and is one of the few numbers in this field that is hard to dress up.

Choosing the right contract letter does not protect against an operator that fails.

How to read the contract before you sign it

Slowly, with help, and long before the day it is needed. A CCRC agreement is a decades-long financial instrument most people sign once, under emotional pressure, without a professional ever reading it. It is worth an elder-law attorney and a look from whoever handles the family's finances, because the sums dwarf the fee for that review.

There is no federal pricing standard to lean on here. Hospitals operate under a federal price-transparency rule prescribing data elements and formatting for a machine-readable file of standard charges, enforced by CMS through audits and civil monetary penalties 5. Nothing in that rule reaches a CCRC residency agreement, which is a private contract rather than a hospital chargemaster. The disclosure a prospective resident receives is a document that has to be read, not a standardized artifact that can be compared line against line.

What to assemble for each community:

  • The full residency agreement, not the summary brochure.
  • The disclosure statement provided to prospective residents.
  • Audited financial statements, and the operator's debt position.
  • The five-year history of monthly fee increases.
  • The exact care promise, written out: which levels, which conditions, which carve-outs.
  • The refund provision, with the schedule that governs it.
  • The terms under which the community may move a resident, or end the agreement.

Where to turn if something goes wrong later. Every state operates a Long-Term Care Ombudsman program that advocates for residents of nursing homes, board-and-care homes, and assisted living, and works to resolve complaints about their health, safety, welfare, and rights 6. It is free. Residents of a CCRC's higher care levels fall within its reach, and knowing the program exists before a dispute is worth more than discovering it during one.

The reason to do all of this now is simple. Every protection described here is available to someone who has not yet signed, and almost none of it is available to someone who has.

Common questions

Type A, life care, charges a large entrance fee and then provides assisted living and nursing care with little or no increase in the monthly fee. Type C, fee-for-service, charges a much smaller entrance fee and bills every level of care at market rates. Type A shifts the risk of a long care need to the community. Type C leaves it with the resident, uncapped.

It depends on facts nobody knows in advance — how long someone lives and how much care they need. Type A pays off for the resident who needs years of nursing care and costs more for the one who never leaves independent living. It is insurance, and it is priced as insurance, so the question is really how much uncertainty a household wants to carry rather than which option wins on average.

No. A, B, and C are industry conventions, not legal categories, and no authority certifies that a contract labelled Type A behaves like one. Two Type B contracts can include wildly different amounts of care. The letter is a useful starting hypothesis for a conversation; the contract's own language is what actually governs, and it is what should be read.

It depends entirely on the refund provision. Some refunds decline over the months of residency until they reach zero; others return a stated percentage whenever the contract ends, and cost more upfront. Either way the refund is a claim against the organization — a federal review found entrance fees can be lost if a community closes or goes bankrupt.

No, and this is the most common misreading of Type A. Life care decouples the monthly fee from the resident's health, so needing more care does not raise it. It does not decouple the fee from inflation and operating costs, which continue to push it up annually. Asking for the last five years of increases at that specific community turns the question into an answerable one.

Sometimes, and it is worth confirming in writing rather than assuming. A contract can be fully life-care for skilled nursing while treating memory care as fee-for-service. Since roughly one-third of people 85 and older may have some form of dementia, a care promise that excludes memory care has a gap in the place the odds most point toward.

Related

Say it back

How would you explain this to someone you love?

Two or three sentences, just as you’d say it. Gale reflects back what you focused on — a mirror, not a quiz.

Talk to a clinician

Gale can help you find a clinician in your state and request a visit.

Find care →

Before signing a CCRC agreement

  • A community that will not provide audited financial statements or its disclosure statement to a prospective resident on request
  • A care promise described verbally on a tour but not written into the residency agreement — including whether it extends to memory care
  • A contract that lets the community change terms for existing residents, or move a resident to a higher level of care without a defined clinical trigger and an appeal route
  • Pressure to sign during a hospital discharge or immediately after a health crisis, when there is no time to have the agreement reviewed

This article explains how CCRC contract types are commonly structured. It is general information, not financial, legal, tax, or medical advice, and it cannot speak to any particular community or agreement. Contract terms, refund provisions, and state oversight vary; the documents a prospective resident receives govern. Given the sums involved, a residency agreement is worth reviewing with an elder-law attorney and a financial professional before it is signed.

References

  1. 1.National Institute on Aging (NIH) (2023). Long-Term Care Facilities: Assisted Living, Nursing Homes, and Other Residential Care. National Institute on Aging (NIH). linkThat a continuing care retirement community offers a continuum of residential care types — independent living, assisted living, and nursing care — within one community, so residents can move between levels of service.
  2. 2.Administration for Community Living (HHS) (2025). How Much Care Will You Need?. ACL.gov (HHS Administration for Community Living). linkThat someone turning 65 today has roughly a 70% chance of needing some long-term services and supports in their remaining years.
  3. 3.U.S. Government Accountability Office (2010). Older Americans: Continuing Care Retirement Communities Can Provide Benefits, but Not Without Some Risk. U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO-10-611). linkThe categories of financial risk CCRC residents face: entrance fees can be lost if a community closes or goes bankrupt, monthly fees can rise beyond a resident's ability to pay, and residents may face relocation. Cited for the risk categories only, not for dollar figures.
  4. 4.National Institute on Aging (NIH) (2022). What Is Dementia? Symptoms, Types, and Diagnosis. National Institute on Aging (NIH). linkThat dementia is loss of cognitive function severe enough to interfere with daily life, ranges from mild to severe, and becomes more common with age — about one-third of people 85 and older may have some form.
  5. 5.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2024). Hospital Price Transparency Fact Sheet. CMS Newsroom Fact Sheet. linkThat the federal hospital price-transparency rule prescribes data elements and formatting for a machine-readable file of standard charges and is enforced by CMS through audits and civil monetary penalties — cited to characterize the hospital rule itself, by contrast with private CCRC agreements.
  6. 6.Administration for Community Living (HHS) (2025). Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program. ACL.gov (HHS Administration for Community Living). linkThat every state operates a Long-Term Care Ombudsman program advocating for residents of nursing homes, board-and-care homes, and assisted living, and resolving complaints about their health, safety, welfare, and rights.

6 sources, numbered by first appearance. General health information, not medical advice. AI-assisted editorial content — citations link their sources. Editorial policy