Guide

Payment parity: coverage parity's expensive cousin

Summary

Not necessarily — and two different rules hide behind the word parity. Coverage parity requires a plan to cover a service by telehealth if it covers it in person; payment parity requires the same rate. Many states mandate coverage parity, far fewer mandate payment parity, and self-funded ERISA plans sit outside state insurance law entirely. So whether a commercial payer must pay the same varies by state and plan type. Your contract controls. As of July 2026.

By Gale Editorial · Updated 2026-07-27. Every figure cited to a dated source. How we write.

Do commercial payers have to pay the same for telehealth?

Not necessarily, because two different rules hide behind the word parity, and both are set by state insurance law rather than a single national standard 1Ref 1National Association of Insurance Commissioners (2026).National Association of Insurance Commissioners.That state insurance departments regulate fully-insured plans and the NAIC coordinates model laws (prompt pay, network adequacy) states adapt unevenly — why telehealth coverage and payment parity are state-set and vary.. Coverage parity forces a plan to cover a telehealth service it would cover in person; payment parity forces it to pay the same rate. Many states mandate the first; far fewer mandate the second, and some of those laws are temporary.

The federal telehealth landscape in this area also keeps shifting, so treat any snapshot as of July 2026 and re-check before you rely on it 2Ref 2U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2026).Telehealth policy.That the federal telehealth policy landscape keeps shifting between permanent and temporary flexibilities, so a parity snapshot must carry its as-of date, here July 2026.. The rest of this page separates the two parities, explains why the same-rate question is a state matter, names the ERISA gap that swallows many state mandates, and ends on what you actually do when a plan will not pay.

Coverage parity vs payment parity

The distinction is the whole article. Coverage parity answers whether the service is covered at all when delivered by telehealth; payment parity answers how much the plan pays for it. A state can require the first without the second, which is the common arrangement — the plan must cover your telehealth visit but may reimburse it below the in-person rate. Both are creatures of state insurance law, which is why the answer changes at the state line 1Ref 1National Association of Insurance Commissioners (2026).National Association of Insurance Commissioners.That state insurance departments regulate fully-insured plans and the NAIC coordinates model laws (prompt pay, network adequacy) states adapt unevenly — why telehealth coverage and payment parity are state-set and vary..

Keep this separate from mental-health parity. MHPAEA governs whether a plan treats behavioral-health benefits as favorably as medical ones; it is a different statute answering a different question, and confusing it with telehealth payment parity leads to the wrong argument in an appeal.

Why 'the same rate' is a state question

Payment parity lives in state insurance law, so the answer depends on your state's statute and can shift with each legislative session. State insurance departments regulate fully-insured plans, and the NAIC coordinates model laws — prompt pay, network adequacy — that states adapt unevenly 1Ref 1National Association of Insurance Commissioners (2026).National Association of Insurance Commissioners.That state insurance departments regulate fully-insured plans and the NAIC coordinates model laws (prompt pay, network adequacy) states adapt unevenly — why telehealth coverage and payment parity are state-set and vary.. Some payment-parity mandates carry sunset dates or applied only during the public-health emergency, so a law that existed last year may not bind this year 2Ref 2U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2026).Telehealth policy.That the federal telehealth policy landscape keeps shifting between permanent and temporary flexibilities, so a parity snapshot must carry its as-of date, here July 2026..

Read your own state's current statute, not a national summary. The same state layer also carries the prompt-pay statutes that govern how fast a clean telehealth claim must be paid, and the external review process for a denial — all of which differ by state and none of which you should assume from a neighbor's rules.

The ERISA hole in every state mandate

Every state parity mandate has the same blind spot: self-funded employer plans. Those plans are governed by ERISA, the federal law for employee benefit plans, rather than by state insurance law — which is why state prompt-pay statutes, assignment, and parity requirements often do not reach them 3Ref 3U.S. Department of Labor (2026).ERISA.That self-funded employer plans are governed by ERISA rather than state insurance law, which is why state prompt-pay, assignment, and parity mandates often do not reach them.. A large share of employer coverage is self-funded, so a telehealth payment-parity law can be real in your state and still not apply to a sizable block of your commercially insured patients.

The practical move is to learn a plan's funding type, not just its logo. Two patients carrying the same-looking card can sit on opposite sides of the ERISA line — one protected by your state's parity law, one not — and only the plan documents or an eligibility check tell you which.

Reading your own contract

Whatever your state mandates, your negotiated contract is the operative document for a commercial claim. Payers publish their telehealth coverage and reimbursement policies; Cigna, for example, posts its coverage and claims policies on its provider portal, and you are expected to bill to the policy in force 4Ref 4Cigna (2026).Cigna Coverage and Claims Policies.Cited only as Cigna's own published coverage and reimbursement policies, a named example that each payer posts its telehealth policy and that your contract controls — not a claim about what all payers do.. Pull the telehealth policy for each plan you contract with, confirm the rate, and treat the contract as controlling where it is more specific than the state mandate.

That is the honest version of the answer to "what does this payer pay": not a number you can look up once, but a policy you read per plan and a rate you negotiated. Keep the current telehealth reimbursement policy for each contracted payer in a place you can reach during a denial.

Medicare and Medicaid are a different track

Do not import the commercial-parity question into Medicare or Medicaid — they run on their own rules. Medicare pays telehealth under its physician fee schedule and telehealth policy rather than a parity mandate, with the behavioral-health provisions now permanent 5Ref 5Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2025).Telehealth Services.That Medicare pays telehealth under its own fee-schedule and telehealth rules rather than a parity mandate, with the behavioral-health provisions now permanent.. HHS's billing guidance lays out the Medicare, Medicaid, and private distinctions side by side 6Ref 6U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2026).Billing for telehealth.That HHS's billing guidance sets out the Medicare, Medicaid, and private distinctions side by side — the basis for keeping the parity question separate from Medicare and Medicaid rules.. Medicaid telehealth reimbursement is set by each state agency, so it varies as much as commercial parity does, on a separate axis.

The reason to keep the tracks separate is that the vocabulary overlaps but the rules do not. "Parity" is a commercial-and-state concept; Medicare uses a fee schedule; Medicaid uses fifty programs. Answering a Medicare question with a commercial-parity rule, or the reverse, is a reliable way to misprice a claim.

When telehealth isn't paid: the self-pay math

When a plan will not pay for a telehealth visit — because it is self-funded, out of network, or simply not covered — the fallback is the self-pay conversation, and that carries its own federal rule. The No Surprises Act requires a good-faith estimate for uninsured and self-pay patients and creates a patient-provider dispute process 7Ref 7Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2026).No Surprise Billing.That the No Surprises Act requires good-faith estimates for uninsured and self-pay patients and creates the patient-provider dispute-resolution process — the self-pay fallback when a telehealth visit is not covered.. On top of it sits the state layer of surprise-billing laws, so a denied telehealth claim can implicate both.

If the service should have been covered, work the appeal ladder before writing it off — the internal appeal, then external review under state law. Mental-health parity may be a separate argument where a plan treats behavioral telehealth worse than medical care. And if the payer itself fails, payer insolvency is a different problem with its own state guaranty process.

Common questions

Not as a national rule. Payment parity — the same-rate requirement — is set by state insurance law, and many states mandate coverage parity without mandating payment parity. Some payment-parity laws are temporary or have sunset dates. Whether a specific commercial plan must pay the same depends on your state's statute and the plan, so verify both rather than assuming.

Coverage parity requires a plan to cover a service delivered by telehealth if it covers that service in person. Payment parity requires the plan to reimburse the telehealth service at the same rate as the in-person one. A state can mandate coverage parity without payment parity, meaning your visit is covered but may pay less than an in-person visit would.

Often not. Self-funded employer plans are governed by ERISA rather than state insurance law, so state parity, prompt-pay, and assignment mandates frequently do not reach them. Because a large portion of employer coverage is self-funded, a telehealth payment-parity law in your state may not bind a meaningful share of your commercially insured patients. Check the plan's funding type.

Read that payer's published telehealth coverage and reimbursement policy and your own contract. Payers post these policies on their provider portals, and your negotiated agreement controls where it is more specific than the state mandate. Confirm the rate and any modality conditions before the visit, and treat the contract as the operative document for the claim.

You move to the self-pay track, which has its own rules. The No Surprises Act requires a good-faith estimate for uninsured and self-pay patients and creates a dispute-resolution process, and state surprise-billing laws may add a layer. If the service should have been covered, run the internal appeal and, where available, external review under state law before writing it off.

Run your practice on Gale

The software is free. Gale earns one flat 3.5% all-in per paid transaction — only on transactions that actually pay. No subscription, no setup fee, no network cut.

Start or manage a practice →

References

1.National Association of Insurance Commissioners (2026). National Association of Insurance Commissioners. NAIC. linkThat state insurance departments regulate fully-insured plans and the NAIC coordinates model laws (prompt pay, network adequacy) states adapt unevenly — why telehealth coverage and payment parity are state-set and vary.
2.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2026). Telehealth policy. Telehealth.HHS.gov. linkThat the federal telehealth policy landscape keeps shifting between permanent and temporary flexibilities, so a parity snapshot must carry its as-of date, here July 2026.
3.U.S. Department of Labor (2026). ERISA. U.S. Department of Labor. linkThat self-funded employer plans are governed by ERISA rather than state insurance law, which is why state prompt-pay, assignment, and parity mandates often do not reach them.
4.Cigna (2026). Cigna Coverage and Claims Policies. Cigna provider portal. link ✓Cited only as Cigna's own published coverage and reimbursement policies, a named example that each payer posts its telehealth policy and that your contract controls — not a claim about what all payers do.
5.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2025). Telehealth Services. CMS Medicare Learning Network (MLN901705). link ✓That Medicare pays telehealth under its own fee-schedule and telehealth rules rather than a parity mandate, with the behavioral-health provisions now permanent.
6.U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2026). Billing for telehealth. Telehealth.HHS.gov. linkThat HHS's billing guidance sets out the Medicare, Medicaid, and private distinctions side by side — the basis for keeping the parity question separate from Medicare and Medicaid rules.
7.Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2026). No Surprise Billing. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). link ✓That the No Surprises Act requires good-faith estimates for uninsured and self-pay patients and creates the patient-provider dispute-resolution process — the self-pay fallback when a telehealth visit is not covered.

https://www.gale.care/for-providers/th-commercial-parity-laws · 7 sources. Competitor details are cited to dated public sources and maintained as they change; figures are estimates, not commitments. Synthetic demonstration.

← Back to for providers