For nurse practitioners · North Dakota
APRN licensure under N.D.C.C. ch. 43-12.1 confers practice authority outright; the collaborative-agreement requirement was repealed in 2011 and no physician supervision or collaboration mandate remains anywhere in the Nurse Practices Act.
North Dakota repealed its collaborative-agreement requirement with SB 2148 in 2011, and the Nurse Practices Act has not mentioned physician supervision since. The pathway is licensure itself: application, graduate education, national certification, an RN license.
The requirement
none — independence at licensure
The moment it attaches
automatic — attaches at initial APRN licensure (43-12.1-09(2)(c): application, graduate education, national certification, RN license)
The timeline
August 1, 2011 (SB 2148, 2011 session, removed the collaborative-agreement requirement)
Since SB 2148 in 2011, North Dakota's Nurse Practices Act has not mentioned physician supervision at all — the statute reserves the word 'dependently' for LPNs, while APRNs carry no qualifier whatsoever.
N.D.C.C. ch. 43-12.1 (§§ 43-12.1-02, 43-12.1-09(2)(c))
Full scope within the licensed APRN role (CNP, CRNA, CNM, CNS) and population focus, including prescriptive practices; the statute contains no controlled-substance or specialty carve-outs. Practice detail is set by Board of Nursing administrative rules.
Statutes move, boards write rules, sunsets arrive. This watch is checked against primary sources on a standing cadence — last verified 11 August 2026 — and every item links the source it was read from.
Nothing pending in North Dakota that we can pin to a primary source. What has already taken effect is below.
Recently effective
North Dakota requires Board of Nursing credential verification before an NP's PLLC may register with the Secretary of State.
The inventory, split honestly. Nothing dark is dressed as live.
In the product today
Opening with the founding cohort
Built, on sample data for now
No physician attached means no standing invoice between you and your own practice — the economics of independence here are unusually legible. What Gale adds is built to read the same way.
The deepest state cluster we have built is California’s — eight guides on the 103/104 ladder, cited to the statute and the board’s own filings. They are California’s rules, not North Dakota’s; the same treatment is coming state by state. Until then, they show the depth of homework to expect from us.
The California playbook →Gale publishes a public directory compiled from the NPPES registry. Find your listing, claim it, and see how you rank for your own name — that page is the front door your independent practice will be found through.